About Crappy Writers & Commenting
Mar. 10th, 2007 02:12 amWhat is the sentence that I hate the most in fan fiction?
A/N – First chapter’s done. Let me know if you think I should continue or not. (From this exemplary piece of crap fic.), a.k.a. "Do praise me because without your continuous ego stroking, I might drop the fic, and as I haven't actually wrote it to the end yet, I can always blame my readers when I drop it due it's going nowhere."
Grr, in the old times is was common to beg for feedback and I did't like it then. Now it's demanding and blackmailing. I would like to believe that a good story will spontaneously generate feedback. Admittedly high profile writers will receive more feedback and some times it's not even connected to the relative goodness of the fics, but generally speaking, if you aren't getting as much feedback as you would like? Maybe that could be because some of the readers werent satisfied with your story. And no amount of pleading and blackmailing for feedback will change their attitudes.
Speaking of witch, what do you think of negative feedback? In a case where you suspect that the writer wouldn't actually gain anything about your feedback (constructive or otherwise) and would only feel hurt by your comment, would you comment still if the fic would be so drastically bad that it would put you in a bad mood? Like this not-very-helpful comment I gave tonight:
One can't know if the writer in the other end is a twelve year old girlie writing her first fic. On the other hand, there could be an adult, self-important shitty writer who just doesn't care. In this case, it's probably the former reason, because the author responded like this to a real constructive criticism: I'm not very good at writing. This is all new to me.
Which, of course leads to the question: Then why are you bothering us?
A/N – First chapter’s done. Let me know if you think I should continue or not. (From this exemplary piece of
Grr, in the old times is was common to beg for feedback and I did't like it then. Now it's demanding and blackmailing. I would like to believe that a good story will spontaneously generate feedback. Admittedly high profile writers will receive more feedback and some times it's not even connected to the relative goodness of the fics, but generally speaking, if you aren't getting as much feedback as you would like? Maybe that could be because some of the readers werent satisfied with your story. And no amount of pleading and blackmailing for feedback will change their attitudes.
Speaking of witch, what do you think of negative feedback? In a case where you suspect that the writer wouldn't actually gain anything about your feedback (constructive or otherwise) and would only feel hurt by your comment, would you comment still if the fic would be so drastically bad that it would put you in a bad mood? Like this not-very-helpful comment I gave tonight:
- The characters are ooc. Grissom would yell and call his workers lazy and think that it would be the only way to learn? Have we been even watching the same series? Usually I have a policy of dropping the fic if anyone cried in the first two paragraphs, but I gave this a chance. But sorry, didn't like it.(Given to this piece of fic)
One can't know if the writer in the other end is a twelve year old girlie writing her first fic. On the other hand, there could be an adult, self-important shitty writer who just doesn't care. In this case, it's probably the former reason, because the author responded like this to a real constructive criticism: I'm not very good at writing. This is all new to me.
Which, of course leads to the question: Then why are you bothering us?
no subject
Date: 2007-03-10 10:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-12 12:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-12 01:53 pm (UTC)